Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘TSCA Reform’

EPA revealed another set of chemical identities in health and safety studies June 8, 2011, here.  I think most of them were “voluntary” by companies, but EPA is claiming some were not. Protect what is legitimate and be ready to back up your claim.  Provide meaningful generic names.  Let it go if you can protect [...]

Read Full Post »

Sen. Lautenberg released the 2011 version of the Safe Chemicals Act for TSCA Reform April 14 here.  I’ve blogged about it before and posted a summary pdf here. The notable changes I see from last year’s version: – References to mixtures and articles have been deleted here and there.  No PMNs by new mixture makers.  [...]

Read Full Post »

EPA declassified confidentiality claims in a batch of 42 health and safety studies (mostly 8(e) notices of substantial risk) March 24, 2011, following through on their promise of transparency. Certainly there are some old claims out there that are no longer valid (many on what was at the time R&D activity that has either gone [...]

Read Full Post »

Proposed bills to reform TSCA have argued to put the burden on chemical manufacturers to prove that there is “reasonable certainty that the substances pose no harm.“ But what does this mean, particularly in light of recent EPA positions on dioxin risk and endocrine disruptor tiered screening? [Covered in Feb 23, 2011, InsideEPA.com's Toxics Regulation [...]

Read Full Post »

Steven Owens, Administrator at the EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, responsible for implementing the Toxic Substances Control Act says TSCA is: “… a kind of blob out there.” [quote from a conference call with the American Bar Association Sept. 16, 2010, reported in Toxics Regulation News Sept. 29, 2010. He was contrasting [...]

Read Full Post »

Environment News Service continues the misinformation that current TSCA law is broken: “Under current policy, the EPA can only call for safety testing after evidence surfaces demonstrating a chemical is dangerous.”  WRONG. Here’s what the law says today (highlighting mine):  TSCA Section 4. Testing of chemical substances and mixtures  (a) Testing requirements If the Administrator [...]

Read Full Post »

What would  TSCA reform bill HR 5820, if it passed as released, do to companies beyond what they have to do today?  This blog deals with my best guess at what the implications are for Chemical Processors and follows on from my previous review for chemical manufacturers/importers.  This blog also deals only with single chemicals [...]

Read Full Post »

Part of a series of blogs on the House bill HR 5820 to reform TSCA. TSCA reform bill HR 5820 sets up requirements for EPA to establish “safety standards” and a new twist on significant new use rules (SNURs).  Here’s a quick summary that applies to scenarios described in related blogs on HR 5820 Implications [...]

Read Full Post »

What would  TSCA reform bill HR 5820, if it passed as released, do to companies beyond what they have to do today?  This blog deals with my best guess at what the implications are for Chemicals Manufacturers [and Importers - still treated the same] for the following scenarios: Scenario A. Company manufactures an existing chemical [...]

Read Full Post »

HR 5820 Toxic Chemicals Safety Act of 2010:  Reporting, reporting and more reporting: TSCA reformers want to squeeze companies for all the data they can as soon as they can.   Who is making and using every chemical for what and how much?  What are all the physical/chemical properties and toxicity data, exposure info, and life [...]

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.