Posted in TSCA, tagged byproducts, CDR, TSCA on January 19, 2012| 1 Comment »
EPA has posted FAQs on the Chemical Data Reporting rule here. Companies can now access the electronic reporting tool, CDX for the rule: here
A meeting was held January 19, 2012, with EPA trying to explain how CDR applies to byproducts:
Some good news: EPA is backing off of recycling as manufacture requiring reporting. As long as all you are doing is separating out (e.g., distilling) a raw material or product (refining) you don’t have to report. Refining and processing a chemical product further to remove impurities is not reportable. Only if you extract or create a substance by chemical reaction do you have a reporting responsibility. Bottom line: A chemical has to have been manufactured by you; a change in CAS# has to have occurred. Solvent recyclers are off the hook!
Muddled further is the situation with impurities that are created by your chemical reactions and how your chemical products, co-products and byproducts are described by CAS#. Are they mixtures of known discrete chemicals or UVCB? It sounded like EPA was saying that it doesn’t matter if a substance is an impurity – if produced by chemical reaction, the only way to avoid CDR reporting as a manufacturer is to meet one of the exemptions: <25,000 lbs, polymers, burned as fuel, TSCA exempt use, disposed. Another CDR exemption is if the chemical isn’t on the TSCA Inventory. Of course, if the byproduct is not otherwise exempt and it’s not on the TSCA Inventory – because everyone considered it to be a non-reportable impurity – you may have a PMN violation.
EPA seemed to be trying to avoid problems it had created in its earlier guidance by considering products and byproducts as mixtures, where the unwanted byproduct components get used in exempt ways or disposed and so don’t require reporting.
The webinar and materials will be posted shortly.
Congressmen Shimkus and Upton are asking EPA to extend CDR some more since there is still confusion. This webinar only confirmed that. http://www.bna.com/upton-asks-epa-n12884907277/
EHS Strategies, Inc. will be tracking this issue and can assist you.
Posted in REACH, tagged REACH, SVHC on January 18, 2012| 1 Comment »
If you want an advance look at what ECHA will be considering for Substances of Very High Concern and for Authorizations and restrictions under REACH, check out this site. Each of these chemicals will be offered for public comment before it gets officially listed, but checking this site will give you time to prepare a response.
EHS Strategies, Inc. can help you decide how to deal with these listings.
Posted in REACH, tagged REACH, SVHC on January 13, 2012| Leave a Comment »
Controversy remains on the notification and communication requirements for Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) in articles. Do you calculate the >0.1% wt/wt SVHC according to each component or for the finished article as placed on the market? Several countries (AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, GERMANY, FRANCE, NORWAY, SWEDEN ) say it’s by component and tough luck on importers: “Once an Article – Always an Article.” ECHA says it’s the entire article. The court will have to decide. But no lawsuits yet.
Here’s Germany’s guidance on the matter: pdf
EHS Strategies, Inc. can help you decide how to deal with these requirements.
Life Cycle Thinking 